Digital Image Boundary Detection

ABSTRACT

In implementations of object boundary generation, a computing device implements a boundary system to receive a mask defining a contour of an object depicted in a digital image, the mask having a lower resolution than the digital image. The boundary system maps a curve to the contour of the object and extracts strips of pixels from the digital image which are normal to points of the curve. A sample of the digital image is generated using the extracted strips of pixels which is input to a machine learning model. The machine learning model outputs a representation of a boundary of the object by processing the sample of the digital image.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 16/822,853, filed Mar. 18, 2020, entitled “DigitalImage Boundary Detection,” the entire disclosure of which is herebyincorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

Boundary detection is used by digital image processing systems tosupport a wide range of functionality. However, conventional boundarydetection techniques are prone to error and are computationallyinefficient, and as such limits the accuracy of functionality thatrelies on these conventional boundary detection techniques.

In one conventional example, a user input is received via a userinterface to manually draw a boundary around an object within a digitalimage, e.g., using touchscreen functionality, a cursor control device,and so on. This boundary is then used in this example to segment theobject from the digital image, such as to move the object within thedigital image, modify visual characteristics of pixels defining theobject, move the object to another digital image, and so on. However,reliance on manual user inputs is typically prone to error, such as byselecting portions of the digital image that do not include the object,do not pixels that are part of the object, result in jagged edges, andso on.

Accordingly, conventional techniques have also been developed to improveaccuracy in defining a boundary within a digital image by a digitalimage processing system. However, these conventional techniques alsolack precision and are computationally inefficient such that theseconventional techniques are not applicable to typical digital imagesizes as collected by current mobile computing devices (e.g., smartphones) due to memory constraints of these conventional techniques.

Conventional techniques, for instance, are memory constrained as beinglimited by a size of a receptive field of the machine learning model.The receptive field is a size of a region in an input to a machinelearning model that can affect an output of the machine learning model.In other words, the receptive field defines an overall size of data thatis capable of being processed by the machine learning model. Even whenimplemented using substantial computational and memory resources (e.g.,in the cloud), the receptive field size typically limits current machinelearning models to processing digital images having approximately 0.25million pixels.

This size is considered low resolution digital images when compared withthe size of digital images captured by current digital cameras. Forexample, digital images captured using a typical smartphone camera haveapproximately 8-16 million pixels, and digital images captured with aprofessional digital camera can have as much as 16-400 million pixels.Therefore, conventional machine learning models are forced to makecompromises and how to process these high-resolution digital images. Inone such example, conventional techniques first generate low resolutionobject boundaries, which are then upsampled for use with the highresolution digital image. Consequently, the high resolution objectboundaries generated using conventional systems are typically inaccurateand frequently exclude portions of an object of interest and includeportions of the digital image that are not of interest. Further, the useof sampling typically results in jagged edges that do not follow actualobject boundaries. As such, the limitations of these conventionaltechniques have a direct effect on accuracy of digital image processingtechniques that rely on object detection, such as object segmentation,background removal, and so forth.

SUMMARY

Systems and techniques are described for object boundary generation. Inone example, a computing device implements a boundary system to receivedata (e.g., a mask) defining a contour of an object depicted in adigital image. The mask, for instance, may define the contour of theobject in a lower resolution than the digital image, and the mask can begenerated using a variety of techniques such as downsampling, backgroundsegmentation, etc. The boundary system maps a curve (e.g.,mathematically) to the contour of the object and upsamples the curve tomatch a resolution as the digital image. This upsampled curve thereforeapproximates a boundary of the object depicted in the digital image,e.g., in its native resolution.

The boundary system then uses the upsampled curve to generate a samplefrom the digital image that follows the curve. This is performed by theboundary system by extracting pixels of the digital image in stripswhich are perpendicular to points of the upsampled curve. The extractedstrips of pixels include pixels depicting the boundary of the object.The boundary system generates the sample as a strip image depicting theextracted strips of pixels.

The boundary system then processes the sample using a machine learningmodel. The machine learning model is trained using training data thatincludes training digital images and corresponding ground truths thatindicate boundaries of objects included within respective trainingdigital images. As part of the training, for instance, the machinelearning model generates a predicted boundary based on a respectivesample taken from a training digital image using the techniquesdescribed above. The predicted boundary is then compared to a boundaryas defined by the ground truth for the training digital image using aloss function in order to train the machine learning model.

The machine learning model, once trained, is thus configured to processthe sample and from this detect the boundary for the object containedwithin the digital image. The boundary may then be leveraged by thesystem in a variety of ways, such as for object removal, backgroundremoval image processing of the object, and so on. In this way, theboundary system is able to employ machine learning using the sample thatwas not possible in conventional techniques that processed the digitalimage as a whole, e.g., such as by downsampling an entirety of thedigital image.

This Summary introduces a selection of concepts in a simplified formthat are further described below in the Detailed Description. As such,this Summary is not intended to identify essential features of theclaimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid indetermining the scope of the claimed subject matter.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The detailed description is described with reference to the accompanyingfigures. Entities represented in the figures may be indicative of one ormore entities and thus reference may be made interchangeably to singleor plural forms of the entities in the discussion.

FIG. 1 is an illustration of an environment in an example implementationthat is operable to employ digital systems and techniques for digitalimage boundary detection of objects as described herein.

FIG. 2 depicts a system in an example implementation showing operationof a boundary module for digital image boundary detection for objects.

FIGS. 3A, 3B, and 3C are illustrations of example representations ofdigital image boundary detection.

FIG. 4 is a flow diagram depicting a procedure in an exampleimplementation in which data describing a contour of an object within adigital image is received and a representation of a boundary of theobject is output for display in a user interface.

FIGS. 5A, 5B, and 5C are illustrations of example representations ofgenerating training data for training a machine learning model.

FIG. 6 is a flow diagram depicting a procedure in an exampleimplementation in which a ground truth boundary of an object depicted ina digital image is extracted, a predicted boundary of the object isoutput, and a machine learning model is trained by comparing the groundtruth boundary and the predicted boundary using a loss function.

FIG. 7 is a flow diagram depicting a procedure in an exampleimplementation in which a mask defining a contour of an object depictedin a digital image is received and a boundary of the object is detectedusing a machine learning model.

FIG. 8 illustrates an example system that includes an example computingdevice that is representative of one or more computing systems and/ordevices that may implement the various techniques described herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION Overview

Boundary detection is used to support a wide range of digital imageprocessing functionality. As previously described, conventionaltechniques to do so initially relied on a user's ability to manuallydefine the boundary via interaction with a user interface. Consequently,these initial conventional techniques are prone to error, the likelihoodof which may be exacerbated by complexities in a boundary of the object,such as for a user's ability to manually trace complex object shapes ina user interface using a cursor control device. Subsequent techniqueswere then developed to assist in boundary detection through use of amachine learning model. However, as described above these conventionaltechniques are constrained by an amount of data that may be processed atany one time. As such, these conventional techniques are not capable ofaddressing digital image sizes as captured by smart phones andprofessional digital cameras in typical real-world scenarios.

Accordingly, systems and techniques are described for boundary detectionthat overcome the limitations of conventional techniques. The systemsand techniques improve operation of computing devices to support use ofhigh-resolution digital images that are incapable of being processedusing conventional techniques.

In one example, a computing device implements a boundary system togenerate a boundary based on a digital image. To do so, a contour isfirst defined with respect to an object in the digital image. Thecontour may be defined in a variety of ways. For example, the contourmay be defined manually via a user input, through use of layering,foreground subtraction, downsampling, soft edge masking, and so on torepresent the contour as a mask. This may be performed, for instance,with respect to a downsampled version of the digital image to generate amask that defines which pixels of the digital image correspond to theobject and which pixels do not.

The boundary system then maps a curve, mathematically, based on thecontour of the object. In one example, this curve is a parametric curve,such as a quadratic curve, a cubic Bezier curve, and so on that ismathematically fit to the contour. In this way, the curve may be resizedmathematically and yet still maintain accuracy, e.g., to maintainaccuracy. The boundary system, for instance, may then resize the curveto support the resolution of the digital image as received by theboundary system.

The curve is then used by the boundary system to generate a sample fromthe digital image having a subset of pixels that are to be used todetect the boundary. The sample, for instance, may have a size that thatis less than an overall size of the digital image. In this way, thetechniques described herein may overcome the challenges and limitationsof conventional techniques to employ machine learning at a nativeresolution of a digital image, e.g., as received by the boundary system.

To do so in one example, the boundary system iteratively progressesthrough points of the curve and computes a direction perpendicular tothe curve at each of these points with respect to the digital image. Theboundary system then extracts the strips of pixels from the digitalimage such that the strips of pixels are perpendicular to the points ofthe curve based on the computed directions in order to form the sample.

As a result, the boundary system generates the sample as extractedstrips of pixels that are likely to include the boundary of the objectfrom the digital image. This sample maintains a resolution that matchesa resolution of the digital image, but is a fraction of a size of theoverall digital image. Thus, the sample is likely to include pixels thatdepict a boundary of the object along with semantic content disposedadjacent to the boundary. In this way, the boundary system generates thesample as including high resolution semantic contents of the digitalimage in a manner suitable for processing using a machine learningmodel, which is not possible using conventional techniques. For example,the boundary system generates the sample in a size small enough for areceptive field of the machine learning model yet still retainshigh-resolution details.

The boundary system then processes the sample using a machine learningmodel. The machine learning model is trained using training data thatincludes training digital images and corresponding ground truths thatindicate boundaries of objects included within respective trainingdigital images. As part of the training, for instance, the machinelearning model generates a predicted boundary based on a respectivesample taken from a training digital image using the techniquesdescribed above. The predicted boundary is then compared to a boundaryas defined by the ground truth for the training digital image using aloss function in order to train the machine learning model.

The machine learning model, once trained, is thus configured to processthe sample and from this generate the boundary for the object containedwithin the digital image. The boundary system, for instance, may map arepresentation of the boundary to corresponding pixels of the digitalimage as described above, this may be used to support a variety offunctionality, including object segmentation, object manipulation, andso forth. For example, the boundary system maps the representation ofthe object boundary by referencing coordinates which describe locationsof pixels extracted from and depicted in the digital image.

The described boundary detection techniques and systems improvecomputer-based technology for generating boundaries of objects depictedin digital images with increased accuracy than conventional systems byimproving operation of a computing device that implements thesetechniques. This technological improvement is demonstrated in thefollowing discussion also by comparing accuracy of boundaries generatedfor objects using the techniques described herein as contrasted withboundaries generated by conventional techniques.

The described systems also improve functionality of the computingdevice. This computing technology improvement is exhibited by comparingcomputational resources used to detect boundaries for objects usingconventional systems with resources used to detect boundaries for theobjects using the described systems and techniques. The describedsystems detect boundaries for the objects in significantly less time andusing substantially less memory than conventional machine learning basedsystems. In this way, the described systems and techniques improvecomputational efficiency of the computing device over conventionalmachine learning techniques.

Term Descriptions

As used herein, the term “high resolution digital image” refers to adigital image having more than about 0.25 million pixels. By way ofexample, high resolution digital images can include digital imagescaptured using a typical smartphone camera having about 8-16 millionpixels. By way of additional example, high resolution digital images caninclude digital images captured with a professional camera having about16-400 million pixels.

As used herein, the term “semantic content” of a digital image refers towhat is depicted in the digital image. By way of example, semanticcontent of a digital image can refer to objects depicted in the digitalimage or features of objects depicted in the digital image.

As used herein, the term “machine learning model” refers to a computerrepresentation that can be tuned (e.g., trained) based on inputs toapproximate unknown functions. By way of example, the term “machinelearning model” can include a model that utilizes algorithms to learnfrom, and make predictions on, known data by analyzing the known data tolearn to generate outputs that reflect patterns and attributes of theknown data. According to various implementations, such a machinelearning model uses supervised learning, semi-supervised learning,unsupervised learning, or reinforcement learning. For example, themachine learning model can include, but is not limited to, clustering,decision trees, support vector machines, linear regression, logisticregression, Bayesian networks, random forest learning, dimensionalityreduction algorithms, boosting algorithms, artificial neural networks(e.g., fully-connected neural networks, deep convolutional neuralnetworks, or recurrent neural networks), deep learning, etc. By way ofexample, a machine learning model makes high-level abstractions in databy generating data-driven predictions or decisions from the known inputdata.

As used herein, the term “mask” refers to an image mask. By way ofexample, a mask can be used to define a contour of an object depicted ina digital image. A mask, for instance, may assign tags to pixels such asto define which pixels correspond to an object and which pixels do not.Thus, the contour may be defined in a mask of adjacent pixels havingdifferent tags.

As used herein, the term “contour” of an object refers to an outline ofthe object. By way of example, a contour of an object can define a shapeof the object.

As used herein, the term “boundary” of an object refers to an edge of anobject. By way of example, pixels within a boundary of an object depictthe object and pixels outside of the boundary of the object do notdepict the object.

As used herein, the term “sample” refers to an amount that is less thanan entire amount. By way of example, a sample of pixels from a digitalimage refers to an amount of pixels that is less than all of the pixelsincluded in the digital image.

In the following discussion, an example environment is first describedthat may employ the techniques described herein. Example procedures arealso described which may be performed in the example environment as wellas other environments. Consequently, performance of the exampleprocedures is not limited to the example environment and the exampleenvironment is not limited to performance of the example procedures.

Example Environment

FIG. 1 is an illustration of an environment 100 in an exampleimplementation that is operable to employ digital systems and techniquesas described herein. The illustrated environment 100 includes acomputing device 102 connected to a network 104. The computing device102 may be configured as a desktop computer, a laptop computer, a mobiledevice (e.g., assuming a handheld configuration such as a tablet ormobile phone), and so forth. Thus, the computing device 102 may rangefrom a full resource device with substantial memory and processorresources (e.g., personal computers, game consoles) to a low-resourcedevice with limited memory and/or processing resources (e.g., mobiledevices). Additionally, the computing device 102 may be representativeof a plurality of different devices, such as multiple servers utilizedby a business to perform operations “over the cloud.”

The illustrated environment 100 also includes a display device 106 thatis communicatively coupled to the computing device 102 via a wired or awireless connection. A variety of device configurations may be used toimplement the computing device 102 and/or the display device 106. Thecomputing device 102 includes a storage device 108 and a boundary module110. The storage device 108 is illustrated as including digital content112, which may be configured as a digital image or other types ofdigital content having digital images included therein.

The boundary module 110 is illustrated as having, receiving, and/ortransmitting image data 114 and mask data 116. The image data 114describes digital images depicting objects and the image data 114 isillustrated to include a digital image 118 that depicts an object. Inthis example, the object depicted in the digital image 118 is a girlwearing a white dress.

The mask data 116 describes masks of objects depicted in digital imagesof the image data 114. The mask data 116 is illustrated to include amask 120 which defines a contour of the object depicted in the digitalimage 118 at a lower resolution than the digital image. For example, theimage data 114 describes high resolution digital images depictingobjects and the mask data 116 describes low resolution masks definingcontours of objects depicted in the high resolution digital images.These contours represent outlines of the objects depicted in the highresolution images.

The mask data 116 can be generated using any suitable technique forextracting a low resolution mask from a high resolution digital image.For example, the mask data 116 may be generated using objectsegmentation, layering, downsampling, edge approximation, soft edgemasking, foreground subtraction, etc. In one example, the mask data 116can be generated using manual specifications. In another example, themask data 116 may be generated using edge refinement.

The computing device 102 implements the boundary module 110 to processthe image data 114 and the mask data 116 for object boundary generation.In one example, the computing device implements the boundary module 110to generate an object boundary 122 which is rendered in a user interface124 of the display device 106. As shown, the object boundary 122 definesan outer edge of the girl wearing the white dress in a high resolution,e.g., in a same resolution as the digital image 118.

The boundary module 110 can map the object boundary 122 to the digitalimage 118 as a segmentation boundary of the object depicted in thedigital image 118. Although the mask data 116 and the image data 114 areillustrated separately, it should be appreciated that the boundarymodule 110 includes functionality capable of generating the mask data116 from the image data 114. The boundary module 110 can do this usingany known system or technique for generating a 1 mask for an objectdepicted in a digital image.

FIG. 2 depicts a system 200 in an example implementation showingoperation of a boundary module 110. The boundary module 110 isillustrated to include a contour module 202, a sampling module 204, amachine learning module 206, and a mapping module 208. The contourmodule 202 in this example receives the mask data 116 describing lowresolution masks of objects depicted in high resolution digital imagesdescribed by the image data 114. These low resolution masks described bythe mask data 116 can be generated using any known system or techniquefor generating a low resolution mask for an object depicted in a highresolution digital image. The contour module 202 processes the mask data114 to generate curve data 210 as described and shown in the following.

FIGS. 3A, 3B, and 3C are illustrations of example representations ofdetecting object boundaries in digital images. FIG. 3A illustrates anexample representation 300 of mapping a curve to a contour of an object.FIG. 3B illustrates an example representation 302 of generating arepresentation of a boundary of the object. FIG. 3C illustrates anexample representation 304 of mapping the representation of the boundaryof the object to a digital image as a segmentation boundary of theobject.

The contour module 202 processes the mask data 116 to map a curve 306 tothe contour of the object depicted in the mask 120. For example, thecontour represents an outline of the object depicted in the highresolution digital image. FIG. 3A illustrates an example of the curve306. In one example, the curve 306 is a parametric curve, such as aquadratic or a cubic Bezier curve. For example, the curve 306 can be aB-spline curve, a kappa curve, Catmull-Rom curve, etc. In anotherexample, the curve 306 may be generated by upsampling the mask 120(e.g., using nearest-neighbor, bilinear, or bicubic upsampling).

The contour module 202 upsamples the curve 306 to generate an upsampledcurve 308. For example, the contour module 202 generates the upsampledcurve 308 as having a same resolution as the digital image 118mathematically. In one example, the curve 306 is defined for adownsampled version of the digital image 118 and the upsampled curve 308has a resolution corresponding to a resolution of the digital image 118.The contour module 202 then generates the curve data 210 as describingthe upsampled curve 308.

The sampling module 204 receives and processes the curve data 210describing the upsampled curve 308 and the image data 114 describing thedigital image 118 to sample the digital image 118 at points 310 alongthe upsampled curve 308. In one example, the sampling module 204 samplesthe digital image 118 by extracting pixels depicted in the digital image118 proximal to the points 310 along the upsampled curve 308. Forexample, the sampling module 204 can iteratively step or proceed alongthe upsampled curve 308 and extract pixels from the digital image 118within a defined threshold of the points 310 to generate a sample. In anexample, the sampling module 204 extracts pixels neighboring the points310 which can include nearest neighboring pixels to the points 310 aswell as pixels neighboring the nearest neighboring pixels, etc.

As shown in FIG. 3A, the sampling module 204 iteratively steps orproceeds along the upsampled curve 308 and computes a direction that isperpendicular to each of the points 310. The sampling module 204 usesthese computed directions to extract the sample from the digital image118 in strips of pixels that are perpendicular to the points 310. Thesestrips of pixels have a defined width based on a threshold such thatpixels defining the boundary of the object in the digital image 118 havea likelihood of being included within the strips. In this example, thethreshold distance may be one pixel, two pixels, three pixels, and soforth. The sampling module 204 extracts the sampled strips of pixelsfrom the digital image 118 to generate a sample 312.

In some examples, the sampling module 204 iteratively steps along theupsampled curve 308 in step sizes of one pixel. In these examples, afirst point 310 and a next point 310 of the points 310 may representadjacent pixels of the digital image 118 along the upsampled curve 308.In another example, the first point 310 and the next point 310 may beseparated by one pixel. For example, the sampling module 204 caniteratively step or proceed along the upsampled curve 308 by two orthree pixel long steps. Gaps between samples along the upsampled curve308 can be filled in by connecting the samples using any suitable methodsuch as interpolation.

As shown in FIG. 3B, the sampling module 204 generates the sampled image312 as including the strips of pixels extracted from the digital image118. Thus, the sampled image 312 depicts pixels of the digital image 118which define the boundary of the object. This is illustrated as a narrowregion of pixels from the digital image 118 along the edge of theupsampled curve 308. The sampling module 204 uses this narrow region ofpixels to generate a strip image 314.

The sampling module 204 generates the strip image 314 as the sample byunfolding the narrow region of pixels depicted in the sampled image 312,e.g., at a constant step size along the upsampled curve 308. In thismanner, the sample configured as the strip image 314 includes pixelsthat are likely to detect portions of the boundary of the objectdepicted in the digital image 118. The sample as configured as the stripimage 314 is also a high resolution image having a resolution thatmatches a native resolution of the digital image 118, yet is a fractionof a size of the digital image 118 and as such supports processing bymachine learning model.

Consider an example in which the digital image 118 is a high resolutiondigital image such as a digital photograph as captured by conventionalmobile phones and dedicated digital cameras. In this example, thedigital image 118 may not be effectively processed using conventionaltechniques as an input to a machine learning model trained to predictboundaries of objects. This is because the machine learning model islimited to processing input images that are small enough for a receptivefield of the machine learning model. The receptive field defines a sizeof a region in the digital image 118 that can affect an output of themodel. This limits machine learning models to processing input digitalimages 118 having up to around 0.25 million pixels even when usingsubstantial computational and memory resources of the computing device102. However, through use of the sample as a strip image 314, a highresolution may be maintained yet still support processing by machinelearning model. In this manner, the sample is small enough for thereceptive field of the machine learning model to process and the sampleand yet also includes the high resolution pixels of interest.

The machine learning module 206 receives the strip data 212 andprocesses the strip data 212 to generate boundary data 214. For example,the machine learning module 206 includes a convolutional neural networktrained on training data to predict boundaries based on strip imageinputs. Because the strip image 314 is generated from pixels of thedigital image 118 which are perpendicular to the points 310, the machinelearning module 206 may process the strip data 212 in a normal orperpendicular direction instead of making determinations based on twodimensions. In this manner, the machine learning module 206 processesthe strip data 212 in one dimension instead of two dimensions whichimproves computational efficiency and increases accuracy of boundarypredictions.

As illustrated in FIG. 3B, the machine learning module 206 processes thesample configured as a strip image 314 (described by the strip data 212)and generates a representation of a boundary 316 of the object depictedin the digital image 118. In one example, the representation of theboundary 316 is mapped to the digital image 118 to segment the objectfrom a background of the digital image 118. Other examples are alsocontemplated, including manipulation of pixels that are solely containedwithin the object, modification of a background so as not to include theobject, and so on. The machine learning module 206 generates theboundary data 214 as describing the representation of the boundary 316.

The mapping module 208 receives the boundary data 214 and processes theboundary data 208 to map the representation of the boundary 316 to thedigital image 118. The boundary data 214 includes coordinates whichdescribe the location in the digital image 118 of the pixels included inthe strip image 314. For every pixel of the strip image 314,corresponding coordinates in the digital image 118 are recorded forreconstruction. For example, the mapping module 208 processes therepresentation of the boundary 316 and determines a path with a minimumenergy cost as indicating a highest probability boundary path togenerate a strip recovery 318 which is illustrated in FIG. 3C.

The mapping module 208 generates the object boundary 122 using the striprecovery 318 in one example. To do so, the mapping module maps theobject boundary 122 to the digital image 118 using the recordedcoordinates in the digital image 118 to generate a segmentation boundary320. As shown in FIG. 3C, the segmentation boundary 320 accuratelyindicates an outer edge of the object depicted in the digital image 118.

Although the object depicted in the digital image 118 includes a singlecontour, it is to be understood that the described systems are capableof predicting boundaries for objects including multiple and/or complexcontours. For example, an object having a doughnut shape includes anouter contour and an inner contour. In this example, the boundary module110 predicts boundaries for the outer contour and the inner contourseparately.

Even though the system 200 is described as including a contour module202, a sampling module 204, a machine learning module 206, and a mappingmodule 208, it should be appreciated that the system 200 can beimplemented in any number of modules. For example, the system 200 canmay be implemented using fewer modules than illustrated. In one example,the system 200 is implemented as a single module. In another example,the system 200 can be implemented with additional modules as well.

In general, functionality, features, and concepts described in relationto the examples above and below may be employed in the context of theexample procedures described in this section. Further, functionality,features, and concepts described in relation to different figures andexamples in this document may be interchanged among one another and arenot limited to implementation in the context of a particular figure orprocedure. Moreover, blocks associated with different representativeprocedures and corresponding figures herein may be applied togetherand/or combined in different ways. Thus, individual functionality,features, and concepts described in relation to different exampleenvironments, devices, components, figures, and procedures herein may beused in any suitable combinations and are not limited to the particularcombinations represented by the enumerated examples in this description.

Example Procedures

The following discussion describes techniques that may be implementedutilizing the previously described systems and devices. Aspects of eachof the procedures may be implemented in hardware, firmware, software, ora combination thereof The procedures are shown as a set of blocks thatspecify operations performed by one or more devices and are notnecessarily limited to the orders shown for performing the operations bythe respective blocks. In portions of the following discussion,reference may be made to FIGS. 1-3. FIG. 4 is a flow diagram depicting aprocedure 400 in an example implementation in which data describing acontour of an object within a digital image is received and arepresentation of a boundary of the object is output for display in auser interface.

Data describing a contour of an object within a digital image isreceived (block 402). The computing device 102 implements the boundarymodule 110 to receive the data in one example. A curve that is mapped tothe contour of the object is generated (block 404). For example, theboundary module 110 generates the curve that is mapped to the contour ofthe object. A sample from the digital image is generated by extractingpixels from the digital image that are proximal to the curve (block406). The boundary module 110 can generate the sample from the digitalimage.

A boundary of the object is detected by processing the extracted pixelsof the sample using a machine learning model (block 408). In oneexample, the computing device 102 implements the boundary module 110 todetect the boundary of the object. A representation of the boundary ofthe object is output for display in a user interface (block 410). Forexample, the boundary module 110 outputs the representation of theboundary of the object.

FIGS. 5A, 5B, and 5C are illustrations of example representations ofgenerating training data for training a machine learning model. FIG. 5Aillustrates an example representation 500 of a ground truth objectboundary. FIG. 5B illustrates an example representation 502 ofgenerating a strip image. FIG. 5C illustrates an example representation504 of a predicted object boundary.

As shown in FIG. 5A, the representation includes a ground truth digitalimage 506 depicting an object and a segmentation boundary of the object.The computing device 102 implements the boundary module 110 to representthe segmentation boundary depicted in the ground truth digital image 506as a ground truth curve 508. For example, the ground truth curve 508 canbe a B-spline curve, a kappa curve, a Catmull-Rom curve, etc. The groundtruth curve 508 is unfolded as a ground truth representation of aboundary 510 of the object depicted in the ground truth digital image506. In one example, the boundary module 110 generates the ground truthrepresentation of the boundary 510 by unfolding the ground truth curve508 at a constant step size. In an example in which a portion of theground truth representation of the boundary 510 is discontinuous anddoes not include boundary pixel, the boundary module 110 adds labels tothe portion such that the ground truth representation of the boundary510 is continuous.

As illustrated in FIG. 5B, the boundary module 110 generates a lowerresolution curve 512 by downsampling the ground truth curve 508. Forexample, the boundary module 110 generates the lower resolution curve512 at a lower resolution than the ground truth digital image 506. Theboundary module 110 then generates a target curve 514 using the lowerresolution curve 512 such that the target curve 514 has a sameresolution as the ground truth digital image 506. In some examples, theboundary module 110 may randomly add small shifts to the target curve514 to introduce position variation during training.

As illustrated, the boundary module 110 samples the ground truth digitalimage 506 at points 516 along the target curve 514. To do so, theboundary module 110 extracts strips of pixels from the ground truthdigital image 506 such that the strips of pixels are perpendicular tothe points 516. In one example, the boundary module 110 determines adirection perpendicular to the points 516 by calculating a derivative ofan equation which defines the target curve 514 which may be expressedas:

$\left( {{normal}_{x},{normal}_{y}} \right) = \left( {{- \frac{\partial{f_{c}\left( {x,y} \right)}}{\partial y}},\frac{\partial{f_{c}\left( {x,y} \right)}}{\partial x}} \right)$

where: ƒ_(c) is a spline representation of the target curve 514 andnormal_(x), normal_(y) are the normal two-dimensional directions.

The boundary module 110 then generates a sampled target image 518 asincluding strips of pixels extracted from the ground truth digital image506. As shown, the sampled target image 518 includes a narrow region ofpixels from the ground truth digital image 506. The boundary module 110generates a target strip image 520 by unfolding the narrow region ofpixels depicted in the sampled target image 518.

For example, given a high resolution digital image I(p, q) and arepresentation of a boundary contour C=(p(k), q(k)) where (p(k), q(k))denotes the high resolution digital image coordinates parameterized byarclength k along the curve, a continuous strip image J_(I,C) may beexpressed as:

${J_{I,C}\left( {k,{t + \frac{H}{2}}} \right)} = {I\left( {{{p(k)} + {t \times {n_{p}(k)}}},{{q(k)} + {t \times {n_{q}(k)}}}} \right)}$

where: t denotes distance in a normal direction; H denotes height of thestrip image; and (n_(p)(k), n_(q)(k)) is a unit normal to the curve atarclength k.

Accordingly, the strip image J_(I,C)(j,i) with dimension H×W is obtainedby sampling k=j×dk,t=i×dt where a tangential step size dk=[|C|/W] andnormal step size dt may be set to 1 for simplicity.

where: |C| denotes a length of C; j=0,1, . . . , W; and i=−H/2, . . . ,0, . . . H/2.

In one example, bilinear interpolation may be applied in the highresolution digital image to evaluate I(p,q) for non-pixel coordinates(p,q).

As illustrated in FIG. 5C, the target strip image 520 is input to themachine learning module 206 which processes the target strip image 520to generate a predicted representation of a boundary 522. The boundarymodule 110 can train a machine learning model of the machine learningmodule 206 by comparing the predicted representation of the boundary 522and the ground truth representation of the boundary 510. For example, apixel-wise weighted l₁ loss between the prediction and ground truthL_(l) ₁ and dice loss L_(dice) may be applied for training to avoidlabel unbalance. Formally, the pixel-wise weighted l₁ loss may beexpressed as:

$L_{l_{1}} = \left. {\mu\sum\limits_{{({i,j})} \in Y_{+}}} \middle| {y_{ij} - s_{ij}} \middle| {{+ \left( {1 - \mu} \right)}\sum\limits_{{({i,j})} \in Y_{-}}} \middle| {y_{ij} - s_{ij}} \right|$

where: Y₊ denotes boundary pixels; Y⁻ denotes non-boundary pixels;μ=|Y⁻|/|Y| and denotes a weight to balance the label; |Y| is a totalnumber of pixels in the strip mask; and S_(ij) denotes the predictionand y_(ij) denotes the binary ground truth at position (i,j) in thestrip image.

Additionally, the dice loss L_(dice) encourages intersection between aprediction and ground truth by maximizing an intersection over unionbetween the prediction and ground truth which can be expressed as:

$L_{dice} = {1 - \frac{{{2{\sum{s_{ij} \times y_{ij}}}} +} \in}{{{\sum s_{ij}} + {\sum y_{ij}} +} \in}}$

where: ϵ denotes a small constant to avoid zero division.

To encourage a predicted edge approaching a ground truth in strip space,a measured distance between the predicted edge and the ground truth candefine a loss function as follows:

L_(strip) = argmax_(w)(s) − argmax_(w)(gt)₁

where: argmax_(w) is a soft argmax along the width of the strip; s isthe strip edge prediction; and gt is the ground truth edge in stripspace.

To avoid edge discontinuity, a c₀ continuity constraint can be enforcedon the prediction. For example, the c₀ continuity constraint ensurescontinuous predictions by penalizing discontinuous portions of theprediction. This constraint is converted into minimizing the followingmargin loss:

$L_{con} = {\max\left( {{{\frac{\partial{{argmax}_{w}(s)}}{\partial l}}_{1} - m},0} \right)}$

where: l is the length of the strip and m is the margin.

The machine learning model of the machine learning module 206 may thenbe trained with the following total loss:

L_(total) = L_(l_(i)) + L_(dice) + αL_(strip) + βL_(con)

where: hyper parameters are manually set α to 0.2 and β to 10 accordingto cross validation.

In one example, the machine learning model can be adapted from U-Net asdescribed by O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Bronx, U-Net:Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation, InternationalConference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-AssistedIntervention, 2015. For example, the machine learning model can includethree encoder layers and three decoder layers and the machine learningmodel may be trained using Stochastic Gradient Descent as the optimizerwith an initial learning rate of 0.1. This initial learning rate candecay by a factor of 10 after every 20 epochs.

Example Datasets

The described systems and techniques have been evaluated on twodatasets. Dataset 1 is a benchmark for video segmentation which includes50 classes with precise annotations in both 480P and 1080P. To enlargethe scale factor, the 480P masks are downsampled by a factor of two. Themachine learning model is trained on a 30-class 1080P training set with240P low resolution masks and tested on a 20-class 1080P testing set.The scale factor is 4.5 for Dataset 1 and results are evaluated frame byframe.

Dataset 2 includes 100 digital images with average resolution of 7 k×7 k(ranging from 5 k×5 k to 10 k×10 k) collected from a public photographdatabase. Object boundaries are manually annotated in the highresolution images and masks are downsampled by 8 times, 16 times, and 32times for evaluation. The model trained on Dataset 1 is applied toDataset 2.

Example Metrics

The boundary-based F score introduced by Perazzi et al., A BenchmarkDataset and Evaluation Methodology for Video Object Segmentation,Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016, isused to evaluate boundary predictions. This F score is designed toevaluate quality of segmentation of boundaries. As this allows changingpixel tolerance by dilation, zero and one pixel dilation is applied toDataset 1 and one and two pixel dilation is applied to Dataset 2 tomeasure how close a prediction is to a corresponding ground truth.

In this manner, the described systems are compared with methods thatupsample a low resolution mask while referencing a high resolution maskand methods that refine an upsampled low resolution output. BilinearUpsampling, Bilateral Solver, Joint Bilateral Upsampling (JBU), GuidedFiltering, and Deep Guided Filtering are upsampling based approaches.Grabcut, Dense CRF, and STEAL are boundary refinement approaches.Curve-CGN and DELSE are active contour methods. U-Net Boundary is U-Nettrained directly on Dataset 1. U-Net Strip is U-Net trained to directlypredict target boundaries on strip images. As a baseline, U-Net Strip istrained using only the L_(i) ₁ loss function.

TABLE 1 Dataset 1 Downsample Factor 4x Metric F(0 pix) F(1 pix) BilinearUpsampling 0.171 0.521 Grabcut 0.232 0.541 Dense CRF 0.268 0.702Bilateral Solver 0.274 0.569 Curve-CGN 0.076 0.160 DELSE 0.271 0.531STEAL 0.171 0.348 JBU 0.175 0.447 Guided Filtering 0.129 0.349 DeepGuided Filtering 0.193 0.461 U-Net Boundary 0.320 0.656 U-Net Strip(baseline) 0.303 0.710 Object Boundary Generation 0.423 0.788

Table 1 presents F score data based on zero and one pixel dilationapplied to Dataset 1 using masks downsampled from high resolutiondigital images by approximately 4×. As shown, the described systems havethe highest F scores of 0.423 and 0.788 for zero and one pixel dilation,respectively.

TABLE 2 Dataset 2 Downsample Factor 8x Metric F(1 pix) F(2 pix) BilinearUpsampling 0.116 0.194 Grabcut 0.063 0.121 Dense CRF 0.278 0.434Bilateral Solver 0.207 0.277 Curve-CGN 0.021 0.033 DELSE 0.096 0.133STEAL 0.282 0.457 JBU 0.140 0.231 Guided Filtering 0.121 0.195 DeepGuided Filtering 0.286 0.420 U-Net Boundary 0.170 0.297 U-Net Strip(baseline) 0.314 0.435 Object Boundary Generation 0.396 0.488

Table 2 presents F score data based on one and two pixel dilationapplied to Dataset 2 using masks downsampled from high resolutiondigital images by approximately 8×. As shown, the described systems havethe highest F scores of 0.396 for one pixel dilation and 0.488 for twopixel dilation.

TABLE 3 Dataset 2 Downsample Factor 16x Metric F(1 pix) F(2 pix)Bilinear Upsampling 0.150 0.187 Grabcut 0.020 0.053 Dense CRF 0.2450.389 Bilateral Solver 0.185 0.247 Curve-CGN 0.018 0.028 DELSE 0.0860.132 STEAL 0.151 0.255 JBU 0.117 0.184 Guided Filtering 0.092 0.145Deep Guided Filtering 0.175 0.269 U-Net Boundary 0.139 0.197 U-Net Strip(baseline) 0.283 0.405 Object Boundary Generation 0.376 0.478

Table 3 presents F score data based on one and two pixel dilationapplied to Dataset 2 using masks downsampled from high resolutiondigital images by approximately 16×. As shown, the described systemshave the highest F scores of 0.376 and 0.478 for one and two pixeldilation, respectively.

TABLE 4 Dataset 2 Downsample Factor 32x Metric F(1 pix) F(2 pix)Bilinear Upsampling 0.070 0.106 Grabcut 0.000 0.000 Dense CRF 0.1420.227 Bilateral Solver 0.156 0.216 Curve-CGN 0.012 0.028 DELSE 0.0800.130 STEAL 0.090 0.144 JBU 0.055 0.090 Guided Filtering 0.060 0.097Deep Guided Filtering 0.090 0.141 U-Net Boundary 0.068 0.108 U-Net Strip(baseline) 0.247 0.337 Object Boundary Generation 0.310 0.427

Table 4 presents F score data based on one and two pixel dilationapplied to Dataset 2 using masks downsampled from high resolutiondigital images by approximately 32×. As shown, the described systemshave the highest F scores of 0.310 for one pixel dilation and 0.427 fortwo pixel dilation. The F score data presented in Tables 1-4 indicatesthat the described systems and techniques achieve state of the artperformance. Thus, the described systems improve technology forgenerating boundaries of objects depicted in digital images.

TABLE 5 Dataset 2 Memory Speed Metric (MB) (seconds/image) STEAL 79594231.0 Curve-CGN 17330 75.2 DELSE 17771 20.4 U-Net Boundary 17000 24.5Object Boundary Generation 3300 2.51

The memory usage and speed data presented in Table 5 reflectsimplementation on a GPU. Metrics STEAL and U-Net Boundary could not beevaluated by processing complete high resolution images due tocomputational resource consumption. These metrics were evaluated ontiles or portions of the high resolution images and the data presentedin Table 5 is based on processing the tiles. As shown, the describedsystems use an order of magnitude less RAM and also generate predictedboundaries in an order of magnitude less time. Thus, the describedsystems demonstrate the highest F scores and also improve performance ofthe computing device 102 by increasing computational efficiency of thecomputing device 102 for predicting boundaries of objects.

In one example, the described systems and techniques improve computingtechnology by transforming a two dimensional task into a one dimensionaltask. Since the strip image 314 is generated by extracting pixels fromthe digital image 118 which are normal to the points 310 along theupsampled curve 308, a machine learning model processing the strip image314 determines how to move in the normal direction which is onedimensional instead of determining how to move in two directions whichis a two dimensional task. In another example, performance of thedescribed systems may be further improved by sampling the digital image118 and stepping along the upsampled curve 308 in two or three pixellong steps. This reduces a size of the strip image 314 and furtherincreases computational efficiency of the computing device 102. Forexample, when mapping, two or three pixel gaps can be connected usingany technique or combinations of techniques.

FIG. 6 is a flow diagram depicting a procedure 600 in an exampleimplementation in which training data including training digital imagesand ground truth boundaries of objects depicted in the training digitalimages is received and a machine learning model is trained using a lossfunction. Training data including training digital images and groundtruth boundaries of objects depicted in the training digital images isreceived (block 602). The computing device 102 implements the boundarymodule 110 to receive the training data.

A machine learning model is generated to detect a boundary within adigital image (block 604). For example, the boundary module 110generates the machine learning model. A curve that is mapped to arespective ground truth boundary for a respective said training digitalimage is generated (block 606). The boundary module 110 can generate thecurve in one example. A sample from the respective said training digitalimage is generated by extracting pixels that are proximal to the curvefrom the respective said training digital image (block 608). Forexample, the computing device 102 implements the boundary module 110 togenerate the sample.

A predicted boundary of a respective said object is generated based onthe sample using the machine learning model (block 610). The boundarymodule 110 can generate the predicted boundary. The machine learningmodel is trained by comparing the predicted boundary to the respectivesaid ground truth boundary for the respective said training digitalimage using a loss function (block 612). For example, the boundarymodule 110 trains the machine learning model using the loss function.

FIG. 7 is a flow diagram depicting a procedure 700 in an exampleimplementation in which a mask defining a contour of an object depictedin a digital image is received and a boundary of the object is detectedusing a machine learning model. A mask defining a contour of an objectdepicted in a digital image is received (block 702). The computingdevice 102 implements the boundary module 110 to receive the maskdefining the contour of the object in an example.

A curve that is mapped to the contour of the object is generated (block704). For example, the boundary module 110 generates the curve that ismapped to the contour of the object. A sample is generated from thedigital image by extracting pixels disposed within a threshold distanceof the curve in the digital image (block 706). The boundary module 110can generate the sample from the digital image.

A boundary of the object is detected by processing the extracted pixelsfrom the sample using a machine learning model (block 708). Thecomputing device 102 implements the boundary module 110 to detect theboundary of the object in one example. The boundary is output (block710). For example, the boundary module 110 outputs the boundary.

Example System and Device

FIG. 8 illustrates an example system 800 that includes an examplecomputing device that is representative of one or more computing systemsand/or devices that may implement the various techniques describedherein. This is illustrated through inclusion of the boundary module110. The computing device 802 may be, for example, a server of a serviceprovider, a device associated with a client (e.g., a client device), anon-chip system, and/or any other suitable computing device or computingsystem.

The example computing device 802 as illustrated includes a processingsystem 804, one or more computer-readable media 806, and one or more I/Ointerfaces 808 that are communicatively coupled, one to another.Although not shown, the computing device 802 may further include asystem bus or other data and command transfer system that couples thevarious components, one to another. A system bus can include any one orcombination of different bus structures, such as a memory bus or memorycontroller, a peripheral bus, a universal serial bus, and/or a processoror local bus that utilizes any of a variety of bus architectures. Avariety of other examples are also contemplated, such as control anddata lines.

The processing system 804 is representative of functionality to performone or more operations using hardware. Accordingly, the processingsystem 804 is illustrated as including hardware elements 810 that may beconfigured as processors, functional blocks, and so forth. This mayinclude implementation in hardware as an application specific integratedcircuit or other logic device formed using one or more semiconductors.The hardware elements 810 are not limited by the materials from whichthey are formed or the processing mechanisms employed therein. Forexample, processors may be comprised of semiconductor(s) and/ortransistors (e.g., electronic integrated circuits (ICs)). In such acontext, processor-executable instructions may beelectronically-executable instructions.

The computer-readable media 806 is illustrated as includingmemory/storage 812. The memory/storage 812 represents memory/storagecapacity associated with one or more computer-readable media. Thememory/storage component 812 may include volatile media (such as randomaccess memory (RAM)) and/or nonvolatile media (such as read only memory(ROM), Flash memory, optical disks, magnetic disks, and so forth). Thememory/storage component 812 may include fixed media (e.g., RAM, ROM, afixed hard drive, and so on) as well as removable media (e.g., Flashmemory, a removable hard drive, an optical disc, and so forth). Thecomputer-readable media 806 may be configured in a variety of other waysas further described below.

Input/output interface(s) 808 are representative of functionality toallow a user to enter commands and information to computing device 802,and also allow information to be presented to the user and/or othercomponents or devices using various input/output devices. Examples ofinput devices include a keyboard, a cursor control device (e.g., amouse), a microphone, a scanner, touch functionality (e.g., capacitiveor other sensors that are configured to detect physical touch), a camera(e.g., which may employ visible or non-visible wavelengths such asinfrared frequencies to recognize movement as gestures that do notinvolve touch), and so forth. Examples of output devices include adisplay device (e.g., a monitor or projector), speakers, a printer, anetwork card, tactile-response device, and so forth. Thus, the computingdevice 802 may be configured in a variety of ways as further describedbelow to support user interaction.

Various techniques may be described herein in the general context ofsoftware, hardware elements, or program modules. Generally, such modulesinclude routines, programs, objects, elements, components, datastructures, and so forth that perform particular tasks or implementparticular abstract data types. The terms “module,” “functionality,” and“component” as used herein generally represent software, firmware,hardware, or a combination thereof The features of the techniquesdescribed herein are platform-independent, meaning that the techniquesmay be implemented on a variety of commercial computing platforms havinga variety of processors.

An implementation of the described modules and techniques may be storedon or transmitted across some form of computer-readable media. Thecomputer-readable media may include a variety of media that may beaccessed by the computing device 802. By way of example, and notlimitation, computer-readable media may include “computer-readablestorage media” and “computer-readable signal media.”

“Computer-readable storage media” may refer to media and/or devices thatenable persistent and/or non-transitory storage of information incontrast to mere signal transmission, carrier waves, or signals per se.Thus, computer-readable storage media refers to non-signal bearingmedia. The computer-readable storage media includes hardware such asvolatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable media and/orstorage devices implemented in a method or technology suitable forstorage of information such as computer readable instructions, datastructures, program modules, logic elements/circuits, or other data.Examples of computer-readable storage media may include, but are notlimited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology,CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, harddisks, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or othermagnetic storage devices, or other storage device, tangible media, orarticle of manufacture suitable to store the desired information andwhich may be accessed by a computer.

“Computer-readable signal media” may refer to a signal-bearing mediumthat is configured to transmit instructions to the hardware of thecomputing device 802, such as via a network. Signal media typically mayembody computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules,or other data in a modulated data signal, such as carrier waves, datasignals, or other transport mechanism. Signal media also include anyinformation delivery media. The term “modulated data signal” means asignal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed insuch a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example,and not limitation, communication media include wired media such as awired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such asacoustic, RF, infrared, and other wireless media.

As previously described, hardware elements 810 and computer-readablemedia 806 are representative of modules, programmable device logicand/or fixed device logic implemented in a hardware form that may beemployed in some embodiments to implement at least some aspects of thetechniques described herein, such as to perform one or moreinstructions. Hardware may include components of an integrated circuitor on-chip system, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), afield-programmable gate array (FPGA), a complex programmable logicdevice (CPLD), and other implementations in silicon or other hardware.In this context, hardware may operate as a processing device thatperforms program tasks defined by instructions and/or logic embodied bythe hardware as well as a hardware utilized to store instructions forexecution, e.g., the computer-readable storage media describedpreviously.

Combinations of the foregoing may also be employed to implement varioustechniques described herein. Accordingly, software, hardware, orexecutable modules may be implemented as one or more instructions and/orlogic embodied on some form of computer-readable storage media and/or byone or more hardware elements 810. The computing device 802 may beconfigured to implement particular instructions and/or functionscorresponding to the software and/or hardware modules. Accordingly,implementation of a module that is executable by the computing device802 as software may be achieved at least partially in hardware, e.g.,through use of computer-readable storage media and/or hardware elements810 of the processing system 804. The instructions and/or functions maybe executable/operable by one or more articles of manufacture (forexample, one or more computing devices 802 and/or processing systems804) to implement techniques, modules, and examples described herein.

The techniques described herein may be supported by variousconfigurations of the computing device 802 and are not limited to thespecific examples of the techniques described herein. This functionalitymay also be implemented all or in part through use of a distributedsystem, such as over a “cloud” 814 as described below.

The cloud 814 includes and/or is representative of a platform 816 forresources 818. The platform 816 abstracts underlying functionality ofhardware (e.g., servers) and software resources of the cloud 814. Theresources 818 may include applications and/or data that can be utilizedwhile computer processing is executed on servers that are remote fromthe computing device 802. Resources 818 can also include servicesprovided over the Internet and/or through a subscriber network, such asa cellular or Wi-Fi network.

The platform 816 may abstract resources 818 and functions to connect thecomputing device 802 with other computing devices. The platform may alsoserve to abstract scaling of resources to provide a corresponding levelof scale to encountered demand for the resources that are implementedvia the platform. Accordingly, in an interconnected device embodiment,implementation of functionality described herein may be distributedthroughout the system 800. For example, the functionality may beimplemented in part on the computing device 802 as well as via theplatform 816 that abstracts the functionality of the cloud 814.

CONCLUSION

Although implementations of digital image boundary detection have beendescribed in language specific to structural features and/or methods, itis to be understood that the appended claims are not necessarily limitedto the specific features or methods described. Rather, the specificfeatures and methods are disclosed as example implementations of objectboundary generation, and other equivalent features and methods areintended to be within the scope of the appended claims. Further, variousdifferent examples are described and it is to be appreciated that eachdescribed example can be implemented independently or in connection withone or more other described examples.

What is claimed is:
 1. In a digital medium environment, a methodimplemented by a computing device, the method comprising: receiving, bya sampling module, image data describing a digital image depicting anobject; generating, by the sampling module, a sample image that includesstrips of pixels extracted from the digital image based on a contour ofthe object; detecting, by a machine learning module, a boundary of theobject by processing the sample image using a machine learning modeltrained to detect boundaries of objects using training data describingtraining digital images and ground truth boundaries of objects depictedin the training digital images; and outputting, by a mapping module, arepresentation of the boundary of the object for display in a userinterface.
 2. The method as described in claim 1, wherein the strips ofpixels are perpendicular to points of a curve that is mapped to thecontour of the object.
 3. The method as described in claim 2, whereinthe curve is generated by applying nearest-neighbor interpolation,bilinear interpolation, or bicubic interpolation to the contour of theobject.
 4. The method as described in claim 2, wherein the curve is aB-spline curve, a kappa curve, or a Catmull-Rom curve.
 5. The method asdescribed in claim 1, wherein the sample image has a resolution thatmatches a native resolution of the digital image.
 6. The method asdescribed in claim 1, wherein the contour of the object is defined as amask for a downsampled version of the digital image.
 7. The method asdescribed in claim 1, wherein the strips of pixels include pixelsdefining the boundary of the object in the digital image.
 8. The methodas described in claim 1, wherein the digital image includes more than0.25 million pixels.
 9. The method as described in claim 1, wherein themachine learning model processes the sample image in one dimension. 10.One or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media comprisinginstructions stored thereon that, responsive to execution by a computingdevice, causes the computing device to perform operations including:determining a contour of an object depicted in a digital image byapplying a mask to a downsampled version of the digital image; mapping acurve to the contour of the object, the curve having a resolutioncorresponding to a resolution of the digital image; generating a sampleimage based on the curve and pixels of the digital image; detecting aboundary of the object by processing the sample image using a machinelearning model trained to detect boundaries of objects using trainingdata describing training digital images and ground truth boundaries ofobjects depicted in the training digital images; and outputting arepresentation of the boundary of the object for display in a userinterface.
 11. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storagemedia as described in claim 10, wherein the pixels of the digital imageinclude strips of pixels extracted from the digital image.
 12. The oneor more non-transitory computer-readable storage media as described inclaim 11, wherein the strips of pixels include pixels defining theboundary of the object in the digital image.
 13. The one or morenon-transitory computer-readable storage media as described in claim 10,wherein the machine learning model processes the sample image in onedimension.
 14. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storagemedia as described in claim 10, wherein the digital image includes morethan 0.25 million pixels.
 15. The one or more non-transitorycomputer-readable storage media as described in claim 10, wherein thecurve is a B-spline curve, a kappa curve, or a Catmull-Rom curve.
 16. Asystem comprising: means for determining a contour of an object depictedin a digital image; means for generating a sample image that includesstrips of pixels extracted from the digital image based on a contour ofthe object; means for detecting a boundary of the object by processingthe sample image using a machine learning model trained to detectboundaries of objects using training data describing training digitalimages and ground truth boundaries of objects depicted in the trainingdigital images; and means for outputting a representation of theboundary of the object for display in a user interface.
 17. The systemas described in claim 16, wherein the digital image includes more than0.25 million pixels.
 18. The system as described in claim 16, whereinthe machine learning model processes the sample image in one dimension.19. The system as described in claim 16, wherein the sample image has aresolution that matches a native resolution of the digital image. 20.The system as described in claim 16, wherein the strips of pixelsinclude pixels defining the boundary of the object in the digital image.